Anoop Sam John 2012-12-04, 08:10
Jan Van Besien 2012-12-04, 19:24
Anoop Sam John 2012-12-05, 11:04
ramkrishna vasudevan 2012-12-05, 11:28
ramkrishna vasudevan 2012-12-05, 11:40
Jan Van Besien 2012-12-05, 15:12
ramkrishna vasudevan 2012-12-05, 17:42
Andrey Stepachev 2012-12-05, 11:52
Anoop Sam John 2012-12-05, 12:55
Andrey Stepachev 2012-12-05, 15:59
Anoop John 2012-12-05, 17:54
Jonathan Hsieh 2012-12-05, 19:23
lars hofhansl 2012-12-05, 21:03
We won't find a secondary indexing scheme for HBase that will fit all
However I am becoming convinced we should distribute as part of the
distribution something good enough for some subset of simple/common
use cases, so users have *something* to try, and can play around it.
Everyone asks for it. All the time.
I'd guess that would look like a coprocessor based solution, so
there's no cost to those who don't want to use it, and minimal changes
to core code.
Maybe it would suit them, or if not at least they will have enough
experience having played around with it to decide why they might need
to do something else and what that might look like for their use case.
On 12/6/12, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say "it depends".
> It seems everybody wants secondary indexes in HBase. The problem is that
> most folks don't agree what that actually means.
> The most interesting problem and discussion point (IMHO) is that HBase would
> need some form of schema description.
> See also HBASE-7221. Assuming we had something like that, it could be a
> building block for a simple built-in secondary index solution.
> In the end you're probably right and we cannot prescribe a single secondary
> index solution that will fit all use cases.
> -- Lars
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 11:23 AM
> Subject: Re: HBase - Secondary Index
> I personally feel that we should only add the primitive apis necessary to
> make this work (and if non are required, all the better!), and to try to
> keep secondary indexing work it as a separate project on top of hbase
> because there are many possible valid architectures and implementations.
> I have two question areas -- one touched upon in previous messages -- what
> logging and how do we get consistency guarantee's do we get bewteen the
> index and primary?
> The other has to do with scalability. I'm not sure I interpreted the slides
> correctly, but from the slides 8 and 13, is the architecture such that each
> primary table region has a corresponding index table region?
> Is slide 14 a comparison of a full table scan vs the indexed lookups on 4
> rs's? What happens if we go up to 20, or 100 rs's? If I'm right about the
> per index region per table region, I have a feeling this isn't going to
> scale well with a large number of regions (since it would potentially have
> to talk to each region and essentially every region server).
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Anoop John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I mean HBase devs to work on having sec indexing available with the HBase
>> distribution... Now I guess many users of HBase implement different kinds
>> of sec indexing ..:)
>> We @Huawei would be happy to provide our support in it as per the interest
>> from the community.. :)
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Andrey Stepachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Can you explain, what you mean under 'HBase community version with sec
>> > indexing in it'. You will wait, until someone implements the same
>> > in trunk hbase, or?
>> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Anoop Sam John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > No this is not open sourced yet.. As per the interest from the HBase
>> > > community we can think of contributing..
>> > > It is time to see HBase community version with sec indexing in it
>> > > :)
>> > >
>> > > -Anoop-
>> > >
>> > > ________________________________________
>> > > From: Andrey Stepachev [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 5:22 PM
>> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > Subject: Re: HBase - Secondary Index
>> > >
>> > > Hi.
>> > >
>> > > Indexing solution looks tempting.
>> > > Are there any plans to open source your solution (or it already open
>> > I
>> > > can't find it?).
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Anoop Sam John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anoop Sam John 2012-12-06, 04:57
ramkrishna vasudevan 2012-12-06, 13:05
Doug Meil 2012-12-05, 21:58
Anoop John 2012-12-06, 01:17
Nick Dimiduk 2012-12-18, 17:48
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-19, 00:51
ramkrishna vasudevan 2012-12-19, 04:24