+1...this will be very useful for fresh starters!
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The vision of the execwork branch was to maintain a development branch
> and then merge to master once we were happy with the quality and unit
> test completeness of the execwork stuff. However, it now appears that
> everyone is working in the execwork branch. Additionally, I've also
> had a number of offhand comments from those less familiar with the
> project who assume that a lack of commits on master means the project
> is less active than it is. As such, I propose that we merge the
> execwork branch back into master and continue to do our work there.
> With the lastest push of Ben's patches for ValueVectors and the merge
> of DRILL-140 into execwork, execwork includes all the changes in
> master and all tests pass.