On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See Jesse's comment:
Sounds like a reasonable concern. In their shoes I'd probably stick
with established/stable features as well.
fwiw during the summit meetup we took a poll and the consensus was
that 3.4 should now be considered stable. Mahadev and I were planning
to propose the next release (3.4.4) as such. So it shouldn't be long
to wait if you are interested in using some of the new features.
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > For Ted's question, developers and ops at the company I mentioned would
>> > able to give their answer.
>> We have a general policy of not adding new features to fix releases.
>> What testing have you done with 3.4.3 that concerns you? Are there
>> specific outstanding bugs?