Olga Natkovich 2012-10-22, 23:36
Jonathan Coveney 2012-10-23, 00:09
Santhosh M S 2012-10-23, 07:37
Gianmarco De Francisci Mo... 2012-10-23, 17:20
Sounds good to me.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess this is the only way to ensure documented code.
> We need to put this rule somewhere, maybe in the Wiki?
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Santhosh M S
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> > ________________________________
> > From: Jonathan Coveney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: how to handle release documentation going forward
> > As someone who chronically under-documents, I think that this is a good
> > idea. +1
> > 2012/10/22 Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Hi,
> >> Since we lost the dedicated document writer for Pig, would it make sense
> >> to require that going forward (0.12 and beyond) we require that
> >> documentation updates are included in the patch together with code
> >> and tests. I think that should work for most features/updates except
> >> perhaps big items that might require more than one JIRA to be completed
> >> before documentation changes make sense.
> >> Comments?
> >> Olga