Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> SVN or GIT


+
dlmarion@... 2013-08-22, 00:05
+
Josh Elser 2013-08-22, 00:09
+
dlmarion@... 2013-08-22, 00:14
+
Christopher 2013-08-26, 18:41
Copy link to this message
-
Re: SVN or GIT
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Since we're on git now... to avoid confusion like this in the future
> (not just from PMC/committers who may not have touched the code in
> awhile, but also from users looking for the source)...
>
> I think it would be useful to do what Thrift did, and replace the
> existing source branches in SVN with a README
> (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/README?view=log). The SVN
> history will still be there, and people will still be able to
> reference tags, just like with thrift
> (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/tags/thrift-0.8.0/?pathrev=1419982).
+1
> I'm personally in favor of removing all of
> {trunk,branches,contrib,tags} with a README, but if people insist on
> {tags} remaining behind, I'd settle for replacing only the other
> three. (Technically, the tags are still there... at the version they
> were created... which is the only reliable way of referencing a tag in
> SVN anyway... so that's why I don't mind removing them in SVN HEAD).
>
> To make things easier on passers-by, we can document in the README,
> the last commit that occurred in SVN, and provide a viewvc link
> directly to that, and can also provide the svn command to check out
> that revision.
>
> Removing these paths from the SVN will help resolve any confusion
> about where our current development activity is taking place.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Josh.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > From: "Josh Elser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:09:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: SVN or GIT
> >
> > No, SVN is not an option for main Accumulo development.
> >
> > The CMS site is still hosted on SVN, that's why the SVN info is still
> > there at all. It could possibly be trimmed some more -- I forget where I
> > left it.
> >
> > On 08/21/2013 08:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Have not committed anything in a while. I read the GIT WIP wiki page.
> Is svn still an option at this point, or do I need to move over to git.
> What's the latest?
> >>
> >
> >
>
+
Mike Drob 2013-08-26, 20:16
+
Michael Ridley 2013-08-29, 02:51
+
John Vines 2013-08-29, 03:00
+
Christopher 2013-08-30, 18:56