Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop, mail # dev - Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta


+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-15, 18:02
+
Arpit Gupta 2013-05-15, 19:54
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 18:59
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 19:11
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 19:19
+
Karthik Kambatla 2013-05-15, 18:23
+
Alejandro Abdelnur 2013-05-15, 18:32
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 19:19
+
Bikas Saha 2013-05-15, 20:16
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 20:23
+
Amir Sanjar 2013-05-15, 18:14
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 18:06
+
Nathan Roberts 2013-05-16, 18:28
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-17, 07:06
+
eric baldeschwieler 2013-05-15, 20:20
+
Sandy Ryza 2013-05-15, 20:25
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 20:29
+
Eli Collins 2013-05-15, 20:43
+
Zhijie Shen 2013-05-15, 20:47
+
Steve Loughran 2013-05-15, 21:21
+
Chris Douglas 2013-05-15, 22:27
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 23:44
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 23:56
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2013-05-15, 22:36
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 20:29
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 20:36
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 20:56
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 21:14

Roman, I keep this same argument again and again. Should've refuted earlier.

Please list down all the issues that BigTop ran into *because of* new features. You continue to argue that new features are destabilizing 2.0.*, which I don't agree with at all. 2.0.3-alpha was the last time major features got merged in, and we found blockers irrespective of those.

MAPREDUCE-5240 specifically isn't due to any feature merge. This was a bug. I'd say this is a long standing bug in 2.0.x. You sure this passed in 2.0.3? Even so, this is mostly broken by another bug-fix and *not* because of any feature.

I quickly checked other bugs you reported in 2.0.x:
 - MAPREDUCE-5088 was caused by the fix for HADOOP-9299 which was again a long standing issue in 2.0.x
 - MAPREDUCE-3728 is similar
 - MAPREDUCE-5117 is similar
 - MAPREDUCE-4219 was a security related feature request from you.
 - MAPREDUCE-3916 was because of new proxy-server added.

I am not arguing that new features *may* destabilize the branch, but you've repeatedly stated this as if that were a fact.

Really appreciate the testing done by BigTop, but please don't distort the facts.

Thanks,
+Vinod
On May 15, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:

> Please tell me if my expectations are incorrect, but to me the -beta would
> signify it being a 'safe' target for the downstream components. We're still
> finding *very* basic and *very* disruptive issues (MAPREDUCE-5240 is
> a good example) that essentially mean DOA for downstream that depends
> on this functionality.
>
> Are we comfortable with delivering 2.0.5-beta and later on starting
> to discover things like MAPREDUCE-5240 more or less accidentally?
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 21:54
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2013-05-15, 23:17
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-16, 06:34
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 21:20
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 22:02
+
Steve Loughran 2013-05-15, 22:31
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 22:50
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 23:47
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 23:54
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2013-05-16, 06:19
+
Steve Loughran 2013-05-16, 17:22
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-17, 19:52
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-05-16, 04:25
+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-16, 05:05
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-05-16, 05:41
+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-16, 05:52
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2013-05-16, 06:38
+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-16, 07:20
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-16, 18:18
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-05-16, 05:29
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 21:15
+
Devaraj Das 2013-05-15, 20:39
+
Robert Evans 2013-05-16, 15:19
+
lohit 2013-05-16, 05:29
+
Doug Cutting 2013-05-17, 22:48
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2013-05-21, 08:33
+
sanjay Radia 2013-05-21, 06:27
+
Mayank Bansal 2013-05-22, 20:17