Jim R. Wilson 2011-06-04, 18:27
Sean Bigdatafun 2011-06-04, 18:40
Jim R. Wilson 2011-06-04, 18:49
I used ec2, but just for experiments. Here is what I did:
a) used the ephemeral disks. My experiment datasets were persisted on S3,
and I copied them onto the cluster.
b) Use the hbase-ec2 scripts. get this repo
c) Consult Andrew's pdf: hbase.s3.amazonaws.com/hbase/HBase-EC2-HUG9.pdf
For the AMI, there is a create-hbase-image script in the above git repo. I
did create for my stuff and it's public, search "himanshu-hbase" and you
should get it. But it's always good to have your own AMI (I learned it the
Consult the run scripts, like bin/launch-hbase-cluster,
One thing was when you run the launch-cluster, the cluster is all set but I
needed to manually add the regionserver's internal ip in the master's
conf/regionserver list. And also the datanode's entry in the conf/slaves if
hadoop directory. This can be done by a script though.
Hope this helps.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Jim R. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> That's helpful. I probably should have added some contextual info. In my
> case, I'm interested in providing instructions on how one can fire up an
> HBase cluster in EC2 order to experiment with it. That is, load data,
> practice administration, etc. In that context, it's unlikely that the
> person following the instructions would start more that 5 nodes, and would
> also not likely keep them on longer than an hour.
> I saw archived email threads where people recommended not running on EC2
> any length of time since you can get better performance-per-cost
> characteristics from dedicated hardware (for example from Rackspace).
> So I guess my real question is this: What is the easiest possible way to
> start a 5-node HBase 0.90.x cluster in EC2? I'm thinking that S3 is better
> for storage, but I'm open to whatever is genuinely the easiest thing to do.
> Thanks again,
> -- Jim
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Sean Bigdatafun
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Here is my thoughts:
> > If your datastorage is used for long-term, then you may consider
> > HDFS storage device onto EBS rather than local disk (Attaching Namenode
> > storage device onto EBS as well). But for this setup, I think we should
> > think of dfs.replication.factor=2 (even 1) because EBS itself has already
> > provided enough reliability.
> > If your datastore is used for ephemeral purpose (say EMR computation),
> > may consider just using the EC2 provided ephemeral disks.
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jim R. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> > > Hi HBase community,
> > >
> > > What are the current best-practices with respect to starting up an
> > > cluster in EC2? I don't see any public AMI's newer than 0.89.xxx, and
> > > starting up that one it's, clear that it's not configured for HDFS or
> > > clustering (empty hbase-site.xml).
> > >
> > > Do people generally keep data in S3 or HDFS? If the latter, is it
> > > persisted
> > > via EBS? Do the hadoop nodes have more than one EBS attached to
> > > distinguish
> > > HDFS from the OS?
> > >
> > > Any help is much appreciated. Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > > -- Jim R. Wilson (jimbojw)
> > >
> > --
> > --Sean
Himanshu Vashishtha 2011-06-04, 19:16
Jim R. Wilson 2011-06-04, 19:25
Andrew Purtell 2011-06-04, 20:30
Jim R. Wilson 2011-06-05, 01:48
Dave Viner 2011-06-05, 05:01
George P. Stathis 2011-06-09, 01:21
Gaurav Kohli 2011-06-09, 05:59
Himanshu Vashishtha 2011-06-23, 21:33