Mahadev Konar
2011-12-10, 00:49
Patrick Hunt
2011-12-12, 18:57
Mahadev Konar
2011-12-12, 19:03
Patrick Hunt
2011-12-12, 19:08
Mahadev Konar
2011-12-12, 19:11
Patrick Hunt
2011-12-12, 19:24
Mahadev Konar
2011-12-12, 23:18
Benjamin Reed
2011-12-13, 04:32
Flavio Junqueira
2011-12-13, 11:38
Stack
2011-12-14, 20:21
Mahadev Konar
2011-12-15, 00:46
-
[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Mahadev Konar 2011-12-10, 00:49
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
addressed in this release.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
thanks
mahadev
addressed in this release.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
thanks
mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Patrick Hunt 2011-12-12, 18:57
some issues found on first look, not sure if these are blockers:
release date in the changes.txt says "tbd"
Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
> addressed in this release.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
release date in the changes.txt says "tbd"
Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
> addressed in this release.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Mahadev Konar 2011-12-12, 19:03
> release date in the changes.txt says "tbd"
Yikes. Is this a blocker?
>
> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
mahadev
>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>> addressed in this release.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
Yikes. Is this a blocker?
>
> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
mahadev
>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>> addressed in this release.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Patrick Hunt 2011-12-12, 19:08
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> release date in the changes.txt says "tbd"
> Yikes. Is this a blocker?
probably not, but can you edit the changes.txt on the branch right now?
isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
plz update the page)
>>
>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>
> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
Patrick
>
>
> mahadev
>
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>> addressed in this release.
>>>
>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> Should we release this?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> mahadev
>> release date in the changes.txt says "tbd"
> Yikes. Is this a blocker?
probably not, but can you edit the changes.txt on the branch right now?
isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
plz update the page)
>>
>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>
> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
Patrick
>
>
> mahadev
>
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>> addressed in this release.
>>>
>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> Should we release this?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Mahadev Konar 2011-12-12, 19:11
> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
> plz update the page)
Its there. Missed it :(.
mahadev
>
>>>
>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>
>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>
> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>
> Patrick
>
>>
>>
>> mahadev
>>
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>
>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>
>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> mahadev
> plz update the page)
Its there. Missed it :(.
mahadev
>
>>>
>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>
>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>
> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>
> Patrick
>
>>
>>
>> mahadev
>>
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>
>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>
>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Patrick Hunt 2011-12-12, 19:24
+1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
Patrick
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>> plz update the page)
> Its there. Missed it :(.
>
> mahadev
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>
>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>
>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>
>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
Patrick
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>> plz update the page)
> Its there. Missed it :(.
>
> mahadev
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>
>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>
>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>
>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Mahadev Konar 2011-12-12, 23:18
+1. Tests pass, deployed it on 3 nodes and tried out 3.3 clients with
it. Upgraded with data on 3.3, seems to work fine.
thanks
mahadev
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>>> plz update the page)
>> Its there. Missed it :(.
>>
>> mahadev
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>>
>>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>>
>>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> mahadev
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>> mahadev
it. Upgraded with data on 3.3, seems to work fine.
thanks
mahadev
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>>> plz update the page)
>> Its there. Missed it :(.
>>
>> mahadev
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>>
>>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>>
>>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> mahadev
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>> mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Benjamin Reed 2011-12-13, 04:32
+1 tests pass and everything looks good. i did notice one problem:
ZOOKEEPER-1327 there are still remnants of hadoop urls in some of our
files. that might explain why users keep finding the old wiki pages!
it's not a blocker, so i don't think it should hold up the release.
ben
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. Tests pass, deployed it on 3 nodes and tried out 3.3 clients with
> it. Upgraded with data on 3.3, seems to work fine.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>>>> plz update the page)
>>> Its there. Missed it :(.
>>>
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>>>
>>>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>>>
>>>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>> mahadev
ZOOKEEPER-1327 there are still remnants of hadoop urls in some of our
files. that might explain why users keep finding the old wiki pages!
it's not a blocker, so i don't think it should hold up the release.
ben
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. Tests pass, deployed it on 3 nodes and tried out 3.3 clients with
> it. Upgraded with data on 3.3, seems to work fine.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>>>> plz update the page)
>>> Its there. Missed it :(.
>>>
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>>>
>>>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>>>
>>>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but unnecessary.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>>>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>> mahadev
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Flavio Junqueira 2011-12-13, 11:38
+1. Tests also pass for me. I have also tested it against bookkeeper/
hedwig and ran some manual tests killing the leader and followers.
-Flavio
On Dec 13, 2011, at 12:18 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> +1. Tests pass, deployed it on 3 nodes and tried out 3.3 clients with
> it. Upgraded with data on 3.3, seems to work fine.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> +1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > wrote:
>>>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>>>> plz update the page)
>>> Its there. Missed it :(.
>>>
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>>>
>>>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>>>
>>>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but
>>>> unnecessary.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>> mahadev
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
hedwig and ran some manual tests killing the leader and followers.
-Flavio
On Dec 13, 2011, at 12:18 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> +1. Tests pass, deployed it on 3 nodes and tried out 3.3 clients with
> it. Upgraded with data on 3.3, seems to work fine.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> +1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > wrote:
>>>> isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
>>>> plz update the page)
>>> Its there. Missed it :(.
>>>
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
>>>>>
>>>>> I did that last time as well. Does that matter?
>>>>
>>>> probably not, I didn't notice it before, seems harmless but
>>>> unnecessary.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> addressed in this release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>> mahadev
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Stack 2011-12-14, 20:21
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
> addressed in this release.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>
+1
Have been running it in hbase load tests over last few days.
St.Ack
> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
> addressed in this release.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>
+1
Have been running it in hbase load tests over last few days.
St.Ack
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.1 (candidate 0)Mahadev Konar 2011-12-15, 00:46
Thanks folks!
With 4 +1 (binding) and 1 +1 non binding, the vote passes.
Ill do the needful.
thanks
mahadev
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>> addressed in this release.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>
>
> +1
>
> Have been running it in hbase load tests over last few days.
>
> St.Ack
With 4 +1 (binding) and 1 +1 non binding, the vote passes.
Ill do the needful.
thanks
mahadev
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.1. 7 JIRAs are
>> addressed in this release.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 5pm PT on Wednesday, Dec 14.***
>>
>
> +1
>
> Have been running it in hbase load tests over last few days.
>
> St.Ack
