Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 04:02
Doug Cutting 2013-02-27, 18:09
Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 18:17
Tatu Saloranta 2013-02-27, 18:34
Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 18:42
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Francis Galiegue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Tatu Saloranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Well, to have user code be aware that it can fail, for one ;)
>> Unchecked exceptions are no uncatchable exceptions, so you can catch
>> them as well as checked ones can't you?
> Sure, but this is not good practice for one, and it can lead to very
> nasty surprises when it fails -- in production, otherwise it's not
> funny ;)
> I catch it right now, but I'd rather my IDE tells me that "hey, it can
> fail here, deal with that" -- and I do.
I do not have strong opinion myself on check vs unchecked exceptions,
but just so know, many Java developers are religiously AGAINST use of
checked exceptions, and consider their use a bad practice.
At best it can be said that this is a controversial question. Feel
free to google to see what I mean.
So it is good to be careful when claiming (as a fact) that doing
something is a bad practice.
It might just be your personal preference.
-+ Tatu +-
Doug Cutting 2013-02-27, 18:45
Francis Galiegue 2013-02-27, 18:47
Doug Cutting 2013-02-27, 19:02
Eric Sammer 2013-03-04, 08:16