Any update on the slowness of 0.92 especially for YCSB workload A
(50/50 read/write, which shows about 40% regression. A 15/85
read/write work load shows 60% regression)? 0.92 seem fine for pure
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to try and test 0.94.0 RC3 a little today. After that I can try
> and do some poking to see why 92 was so slow.
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyone looked into the apparent performance issue that Elliott reported
>> earlier this week? If we have a big perf regression from 0.90 we should
>> probably spend at least a few minutes looking into it.
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes
>> > since 0.92.1:
>> > St.Ack
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera