Well, to be more clear, I'm wondering how hadoop-mapreduce can be optimized
in a block-less filesystem... And am thinking about application tier ways
to simulate blocks - i.e. by making the granularity of partitions smaller.
Wondering, if there is a way to hack an increased numbers of partitions as
a mechanism to simulate blocks - or wether this is just a bad idea
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Mohammad Tariq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Jay,
> What are you going to do in your custom InputFormat and partitioner?Is
> your InputFormat is going to create larger splits which will overlap with
> larger blocks?If that is the case, IMHO, then you are going to reduce the
> no. of mappers thus reducing the parallelism. Also, much larger block size
> will put extra overhead when it comes to disk I/O.
> Warm Regards,
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Jay Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi guys:
>> Im wondering - if I'm running mapreduce jobs on a cluster with large
>> block sizes - can i increase performance with either:
>> 1) A custom FileInputFormat
>> 2) A custom partitioner
>> 3) -DnumReducers
>> Clearly, (3) will be an issue due to the fact that it might overload
>> tasks and network traffic... but maybe (1) or (2) will be a precise way to
>> "use" partitions as a "poor mans" block.
>> Just a thought - not sure if anyone has tried (1) or (2) before in order
>> to simulate blocks and increase locality by utilizing the partition API.
>> Jay Vyas
Mohammad Tariq 2013-04-30, 19:38
Jay Vyas 2013-04-30, 19:59
Mohammad Tariq 2013-04-30, 20:09