Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Stack 2013-08-30, 19:01
I'll cut the RC this afternoon.  JD fixed the replication dataloss issue
and Jon's KeyValue to Cell changes are going in now.  There may be still a
dataloss issue over long runs of integration tests -- Elliott is on this
still -- but I don't think we need hold up the RC for this.

Speak now if any objection to our RCing today.

Thanks,
St.Ack
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Almost there.  A bunch of stuff got resolved in the last few days.  JD is
> running a few replication tests.  Elliott is confirming schema edit is what
> breaks one of the long-running it tests.  Jon is on the last changes to API
> (exposing Cell).  Tomorrow hopefully we can the first 0.96.0RC.  Meantime,
> help testing tip appreciated before we cut the RC.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking of cutting a 0.96.0RC0 on Monday.  You lot good w/ that?
>>
>> The only real blocker is HBASE-8348, the migration script, but that is
>> making good progress and should be well done by Monday (Elliott is seeing
>> some strange issues in his test rig but hopefully we'll nail them before
>> Monday comes around).  The placeholders for tags should make it in.  What
>> else do we need?
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:30 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >>Lets then make a tags-only release on the
>>>> heels of 0.96.  As said above, tags is cause enough for a major hbase
>>>> release.
>>>> Okie. Let me see if anything is needed so that we can avoid
>>>> compatability
>>>> issues later.  I will consider your suggestion also.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you need "placeholders" -- as per Todd suggestion -- then lets get
>>> them in (they can come in after 0.95.2 and before 0.96.0RC0 np).
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>
>>
>