Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # dev >> Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta


+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-15, 18:02
+
Arpit Gupta 2013-05-15, 19:54
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 18:59
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 19:11
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 19:19
+
Karthik Kambatla 2013-05-15, 18:23
+
Alejandro Abdelnur 2013-05-15, 18:32
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 19:19
+
Bikas Saha 2013-05-15, 20:16
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 20:23
+
Amir Sanjar 2013-05-15, 18:14
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 18:06
+
Nathan Roberts 2013-05-16, 18:28
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-17, 07:06
+
eric baldeschwieler 2013-05-15, 20:20
+
Sandy Ryza 2013-05-15, 20:25
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 20:29
+
Eli Collins 2013-05-15, 20:43
+
Zhijie Shen 2013-05-15, 20:47
+
Steve Loughran 2013-05-15, 21:21
+
Chris Douglas 2013-05-15, 22:27
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 23:44
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta
I'm actually drafting such a proposal.  Will open the discussion as a
[PROPOSAL] in general@
--Matt
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On May 15, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) on the proposal.
> >
> > However, the value we get from these "release plan" votes is dubious,
> > to put it mildly. The surrounding discussion has cost more than it is
> > worth, and votes on executive summaries of releases discourage the
> > sort of detailed collaboration we're trying to create. It replaces
> > development with zero-sum struggles over abstractions.
>
> Agree, I propose we edit bylaws to do away with them for the future.
> >
> > This is, in effect, another poll about the direction we're taking 2.x.
> > If we can't reach consensus on development directions without voting,
> > that's more evidence that the project should be split, IMO. -C
>
> +1e100
>
> Arun
>
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> On 15 May 2013 10:57, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Folks,
> >>>
> >>> A considerable number of people have expressed confusion regarding the
> >>> recent vote on 2.0.5, beta status etc. given lack of specifics, the
> voting
> >>> itself (validity of the vote itself, whose votes are binding) etc.
> >>>
> >>> IMHO technical arguments (incompatibility b/w 2.0 & 2.1, current
> stability
> >>> of 3 features under debate etc.) have been lost in the discussion in
> favor
> >>> of non-technical (almost dramatic) nuances such as "seizing the
> moment".
> >>> There is now dangerous talk of tolerating incompatibility b/w 2.0 and
> 2.1)
> >>> - this is a red flag for me; particularly when there are just 3
> features
> >>> being debated and active committers and contributors are confident of
> and
> >>> ready to stand by their work. All patches, I believe, are ready to be
> >>> merged in the the next few days per discussions on jira. This will,
> >>> clearly, not delay the other API work which everyone agrees is
> crucial. As
> >>> a result, I feel no recourse but to restart a new vote - all attempts
> at
> >>> calm, reasoned, civil discussion based on technical arguments have
> come to
> >>> naught - I apologize for the thrash caused to everyone's attention.
> >>>
> >>> To get past all of this confusion, I'd like to present an alternate,
> >>> specific proposal for consideration.
> >>>
> >>> I propose we continue the original plan and make a 2.0.5-beta release
> by
> >>> May end with the following content:
> >>> # HDFS-347
> >>> # HDFS Snapshots
> >>> # Windows support
> >>> # Necessary & final API/protocol changes such as:
> >>> * Final YARN API changes: YARN-386
> >>> * MR Binary Compatibility: MAPREDUCE-5108
> >>> * Final RPC cleanup: HADOOP-8990
> >>>
> >>> People working on the above features have all expressed considerable
> >>> comfort with them and are ready to stand-by to help expedite any
> necessary
> >>> bug-fixes etc. to get to stabilization quickly. I'm confident we can
> get
> >>> this release out by end of May. This sets stage for a hadoop-2.x GA
> release
> >>> right after with some more testing - this means I think I can quickly
> turn
> >>> around and make bug-fix releases as necessary right after 2.0.5-beta.
> >>>
> >>> I request that people consider helping out with this plan and sign up
> to
> >>> help push hadoop-2.x to stability as outlined above. I believe this
> will
> >>> help achieve our shared goals of quickly stabilizing hadoop-2 and help
> >>> ensure we can support it for forseeable future in a compatible manner
> for
> >>> the benefit of our users and downstream projects.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote, the vote will run the normal 7 days. Obviously, I'm +1.
> >>>
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
>
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2013-05-15, 22:36
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 20:29
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 20:36
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 20:56
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 21:14
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 21:54
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2013-05-15, 23:17
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-16, 06:34
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 21:20
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 22:02
+
Steve Loughran 2013-05-15, 22:31
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-15, 22:50
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-15, 23:47
+
Matt Foley 2013-05-15, 23:54
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2013-05-16, 06:19
+
Steve Loughran 2013-05-16, 17:22
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2013-05-17, 19:52
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-05-16, 04:25
+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-16, 05:05
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-05-16, 05:41
+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-16, 05:52
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2013-05-16, 06:38
+
Suresh Srinivas 2013-05-16, 07:20
+
Arun C Murthy 2013-05-16, 18:18
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-05-16, 05:29
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2013-05-15, 21:15
+
Devaraj Das 2013-05-15, 20:39
+
Robert Evans 2013-05-16, 15:19
+
lohit 2013-05-16, 05:29
+
Doug Cutting 2013-05-17, 22:48
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2013-05-21, 08:33
+
sanjay Radia 2013-05-21, 06:27
+
Mayank Bansal 2013-05-22, 20:17