Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HDFS >> mail # dev >> VOTE: HDFS-347 merge


Copy link to this message
-
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
I still do not see a valid reason to remove HDFS-2246 immediately.  Some users may have insecure clusters and they don't want to change their configuration.

BTW, is Unix Domain Socket supported by all Unix-like systems?  Does anyone can confirm that or show some counterexamples?
Tsz-Wo

________________________________
 From: Aaron T. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tsz Wo Sze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
 
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Another
>  substantive concern is that HDFS-347 is not as well tested as
> HDFS-2246.  So, we should keep HDFS-2246 around for sometime and remove
> it later.  Is this the usual practice?
>

I'm proposing we do just that - keep HDFS-2246 around in branch-2 to let
HDFS-347 soak a bit on trunk and then remove HDFS-2246 from branch-2 once
we're confident in HDFS-347 and trunk adds Windows support. As Colin
pointed out, this VOTE has always been about only merging this branch to
trunk.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB