Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HDFS >> mail # dev >> VOTE: HDFS-347 merge


Copy link to this message
-
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
I still do not see a valid reason to remove HDFS-2246 immediately.  Some users may have insecure clusters and they don't want to change their configuration.

BTW, is Unix Domain Socket supported by all Unix-like systems?  Does anyone can confirm that or show some counterexamples?
Tsz-Wo

________________________________
 From: Aaron T. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tsz Wo Sze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
 
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Another
>  substantive concern is that HDFS-347 is not as well tested as
> HDFS-2246.  So, we should keep HDFS-2246 around for sometime and remove
> it later.  Is this the usual practice?
>

I'm proposing we do just that - keep HDFS-2246 around in branch-2 to let
HDFS-347 soak a bit on trunk and then remove HDFS-2246 from branch-2 once
we're confident in HDFS-347 and trunk adds Windows support. As Colin
pointed out, this VOTE has always been about only merging this branch to
trunk.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera