Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - [VOTE] The 1st hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download
Stack 2013-09-03, 13:06
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have created:
>  HBASE-9412
>  HBASE-9413
>  HBASE-9414
>
> I have not been able yet to reproduce the ZK error. I'm trying.
>
>
Is it when you have a shell connection and then kill it?

> Last, I tried, with no success, to set loglevel to WARN to remove all
> DEBUG and INFO logs. Setting it to WARN remove the DEBUG lines, but I
> keep getting the INFO. Seems that something is setting the log level
> somewhere else, or it's not read.
>
> Here is my log4j.properties file. I removed all the customed log level
> to setup WARN for org.apache. And it's still showing INFO...
>
>

You did it by editing log4j and restarting or in the UI?  I think the UI
log level setting is broke.... (new issue!)

Thanks for trying it out JMS,

So everything is slower in 0.96?
St.Ack

> JM
>
>
> # Define some default values that can be overridden by system properties
> hbase.root.logger=WARN,console
> hbase.security.logger=WARN,console
> hbase.log.dir=.
> hbase.log.file=hbase.log
>
> # Define the root logger to the system property "hbase.root.logger".
> log4j.rootLogger=${hbase.root.logger}
>
> # Logging Threshold
> log4j.threshold=ALL
>
> #
> # Daily Rolling File Appender
> #
> log4j.appender.DRFA=org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
> log4j.appender.DRFA.File=${hbase.log.dir}/${hbase.log.file}
>
> # Rollver at midnight
> log4j.appender.DRFA.DatePattern=.yyyy-MM-dd
>
> # 30-day backup
> #log4j.appender.DRFA.MaxBackupIndex=30
> log4j.appender.DRFA.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
>
> # Pattern format: Date LogLevel LoggerName LogMessage
> log4j.appender.DRFA.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{ISO8601} %-5p [%t] %c{2}:
> %m%n
>
> # Rolling File Appender properties
> hbase.log.maxfilesize=256MB
> hbase.log.maxbackupindex=20
>
> # Rolling File Appender
> log4j.appender.RFA=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
> log4j.appender.RFA.File=${hbase.log.dir}/${hbase.log.file}
>
> log4j.appender.RFA.MaxFileSize=${hbase.log.maxfilesize}
> log4j.appender.RFA.MaxBackupIndex=${hbase.log.maxbackupindex}
>
> log4j.appender.RFA.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
> log4j.appender.RFA.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{ISO8601} %-5p [%t] %c{2}:
> %m%n
>
> #
> # Security audit appender
> #
> hbase.security.log.file=SecurityAuth.audit
> hbase.security.log.maxfilesize=256MB
> hbase.security.log.maxbackupindex=20
> log4j.appender.RFAS=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender
> log4j.appender.RFAS.File=${hbase.log.dir}/${hbase.security.log.file}
> log4j.appender.RFAS.MaxFileSize=${hbase.security.log.maxfilesize}
> log4j.appender.RFAS.MaxBackupIndex=${hbase.security.log.maxbackupindex}
> log4j.appender.RFAS.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
> log4j.appender.RFAS.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{ISO8601} %p %c: %m%n
> log4j.category.SecurityLogger=${hbase.security.logger}
> log4j.additivity.SecurityLogger=false
>
> #log4j.logger.SecurityLogger.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.AccessController=TRACE
>
> #
> # Null Appender
> #
> log4j.appender.NullAppender=org.apache.log4j.varia.NullAppender
>
> #
> # console
> # Add "console" to rootlogger above if you want to use this
> #
> log4j.appender.console=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender
> log4j.appender.console.target=System.err
> log4j.appender.console.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
> log4j.appender.console.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{ISO8601} %-5p [%t]
> %c{2}: %m%n
>
> # Custom Logging levels
>
> log4j.logger.ore.apache=WARN
>
> 2013/9/2 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi St.Ack,
> >
> > I will open the relate JIRAs in few minutes.
> >
> > Regarding performances, RandomSeekScanTest is way slower, and only
> > RandomScanWithRange100Test was faster. Others were similar. For
> > RandomScanWithRange100Test I suspect that I don't have the right
> > number for 0.94 so 0.94.11 tests are running right now on the same
> > server with the same configuration. I will start to have numbers by
> > end of day, else, tomorrow morning, but will most probably take about