Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Drill, mail # dev - RC3 Vote: Third time's the charm?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: RC3 Vote: Third time's the charm?
Lisen Mu 2013-09-09, 04:19
Bravo!

by the way, nice logo!

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ashish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> IMHO, I would prefer to focus on following
>
> 1. Fix Header, RAT should run clean
> 2. Fix License, it's painful, but get it's best to get it right first time
> 3. Source only release, which builds fine and test passes fine
>
> This would be good to get the release all the +1's needed.
>
> I will hunt down the Licensing related discussion that we had, to see if I
> can help here. Alternatively, reaching out to incubator general always help
> (sebb is very helpful in fixing this aspect ). I shall try to spend time on
> this in next few hours.
>
> Hopefully, we shall have a release soon :)
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Regarding libs, I concur.  The source release does not have jars.   I
> think
> > I may have confused myself by unpacking both into the same place and not
> > properly cleaning in between.
> >
> > Regarding licenses and headers, I don't know the full list.  Clearly we
> > need license info about netty since we include that code.  Clearly a fair
> > bit of code doesn't have any headers.  Removing the sandbox from the
> source
> > release might be a strong step toward fixing that in the actual release.
> >
> > I suspect that because we keep finding lint that this isn't a complete
> list
> > of problems. I think that generating a better list of problems by having
> a
> > small group meet and walk through the (large and confusing) Apache
> release
> > guide would be helpful.
> >
> > I have asked Grant and Isabel to take a peek and help us get a more
> > complete view of what is needed as well.  I may ask somebody else from
> the
> > incubator crew to give us a hand, especially if Grant and Isabel are tied
> > up.
> >
> > A big part of the problem has to do with the fact that Apache release
> > processes are a bit variable.  Another part is that the standards are
> > changing.  Another is that there are *lots* of details to be covered.
> >
> > Once this first release is done, a second release should be massively
> > easier.  Frankly, the difficulty of the first release is precisely the
> > point of the incubator and the mentor system.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Libs:
> > > The source release doesn't have any jars in it as far as I can tell...
> > >
> > > License Headers/Netty:
> > > Are you saying we need to fix license headers and add a notice for
> Netty
> > > then do another rc?  If so, is there anything else we need to do
> before I
> > > do the work of another release?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Do we have the list of licenses?  Or has someone run RAT?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I just ran RAT.
> > > >
> > > > We have lots of files with no license headers.
> > > >
> > > > We also have code with Netty headers which isn't mentioned in the
> > NOTICES
> > > > or LICENSES file.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> thanks
> ashish
>
> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>