Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Re: HBase - stable versions


Copy link to this message
-
Re: HBase - stable versions
BTW, can somebody explain the function/purpose of 0.95.2. Do the community expect 0.95.2 to be used in a prod env or does it have to 0.96.0 for that ? Also, I have some development hiccups with it (like cannot find the jar on the maven repo etc, if somebody can provide pointers that would be great).

 
Regards,
- kiru
________________________________
 From: Ameya Kanitkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kiru Pakkirisamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
 

We (Groupon), will also stick to 0.94 for near future.

Ameya
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Kiru Pakkirisamy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> When is 0.96 release being planned ? Right now we are testing against
> 0.95.2 as this does not seem to have the HBASE-9410 bug.
>
>
> Regards,
> - kiru
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: hbase-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 6:20 PM
> Subject: Re: HBase - stable versions
>
>
> As long as there is interest for 0.94, we will care for 0.94. However, when
> 0.96.0 comes out, it will be marked as the next stable release, so I expect
> that we would promote newcomers that branch.
>
> Any committer can propose any branch and release candidate any time, so if
> there are road blocks for 0.94.x mainline, you might as well propose a new
> branch.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We, at Pinterest, are also going to stay on 0.94 for a while since it has
> > worked well for us and we don't have the resources to test 0.96 in the
> EC2
> > environment. That may change in the future but we don't know when...
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If LarsH is willing to stay on as RM for 0.94 then IMHO we should
> proceed
> > > as today with the exception that 0.96 is what the stable symlink points
> > to.
> > >
> > > As long as 0.94 has someone willing to RM and users such as Salesforce
> > then
> > > there will be individuals there and in the community motivated to keep
> it
> > > in good working order with occasional point releases. We should not
> throw
> > > up roadblocks or adopt an arbitrary policy, as long as new features
> > arrive
> > > in the branch as backports, and the changes maintain our point release
> > > compatibility criteria (rolling restarts possible, no API regressions).
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:30 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > With 0.96 being imminent we should start a discussion about
> continuing
> > > > support for 0.94.
> > > >
> > > > 0.92 became stale pretty soon after 0.94 was released.
> > > > The relationship between 0.94 and 0.96 is slightly different, though:
> > > >
> > > > 1. 0.92.x could be upgraded to 0.94.x without downtime
> > > > 2. 0.92 clients and servers are mutually compatible with 0.94 clients
> > and
> > > > servers
> > > > 3. the user facing API stayed backward compatible
> > > >
> > > > None of the above is true when moving from 0.94 to 0.96+.
> > > > Upgrade from 0.94 to 0.96 will require a one-way upgrade process
> > > including
> > > > downtime, and client and server need to be upgraded in lockstep.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to have an informal poll about who's using 0.94 and is
> > > > planning to continue to use it; and who is planning to upgrade from
> > 0.94
> > > to
> > > > 0.96.
> > > > Should we officially continue support for 0.94? How long?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > -- Lars
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB