-Re: Is it OK to run with no secondary namenode?
Aaron Kimball 2009-10-05, 19:23
Quite possible. :\
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Mayuran Yogarajah <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Kimball wrote:
>> If you want to run the 2NN on a different node than the NN, then you need
>> set dfs.http.address on the 2NN to point to the namenode's http server
>> address. See
>> - Aaron
> Uhh this wasn't obvious, I totally missed it. So I'm guessing the 2NN
> hasn't been able
> to upload the merged image back to the NN?