Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # user >> Is it OK to run with no secondary namenode?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Is it OK to run with no secondary namenode?
Quite possible. :\
- A

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Mayuran Yogarajah <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Aaron Kimball wrote:
>
>> If you want to run the 2NN on a different node than the NN, then you need
>> to
>> set dfs.http.address on the 2NN to point to the namenode's http server
>> address. See
>>
>> http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/02/10/multi-host-secondarynamenode-configuration/
>>
>> - Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>
> Uhh this wasn't obvious, I totally missed it.  So I'm guessing the 2NN
> hasn't been able
> to upload the merged image back to the NN?
>
> thanks,
> M
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB