Does that imply that what 0.8 puts in JMX is a superset of what's in JMX in 0.7?
Or have names or types of beans changed?
Also, do you recommend getting metrics via JMX or via HTTP?
Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase / Hadoop - http://sematext.com/spm
> From: Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:20 AM
>Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX
>0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through
>metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring.
>On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see
>> http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ). We use Kafka ourselves and
>> would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase,
>> Solr, and other metrics we monitor.
>> My questions:
>> * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka?
>> * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM?
>> * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8? Is
>> 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7?
>> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
>> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html