Jason Rosenberg 2013-03-28, 07:43
Jun Rao 2013-03-28, 15:11
By the way, the jira queue needs to be updated to know that 0.7.2 is now a
released version, etc.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you file a jira so that we can track it?
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > It looks like there is a race condition between the settings for the 2
> > properties: log.default.flush.scheduler.interval.ms &
> > log.default.flush.interval.ms. I'm using 0.7.2.
> > By default, both of these get set to 3000ms (and in the docs, it
> > recommends setting flushInterval to be a multiple of the
> > flushSchedulerInterval).
> > However, the code in LogManager.flushAllLogs (which is scheduled to
> > run at a fixed rate using the flushSchedulerInterval property) looks
> > like this:
> > val timeSinceLastFlush = System.currentTimeMillis -
> > log.getLastFlushedTime
> > var logFlushInterval = config.defaultFlushIntervalMs
> > ....
> > ....
> > if(timeSinceLastFlush >= logFlushInterval)
> > log.flush
> > So, it will only flush logs if the the time since the last flush is
> > longer than the flush interval. But, the log.lastFlushedTime is not
> > set until after flushing is completed (which can incur some io time).
> > Thus, by enabling TRACE logging for this method, I was able to see
> > that with the defaults, timeSinceLastFlush was usually about 2998
> > (which is less than the logFlushInterval of 3000). Thus, setting a
> > flushInterval the same as the scheduler.flushInterval essentially
> > devolves to an effective flushInterval = 2X the
> > schedulerFlushInterval.
> > So, setting a flushIinterval slightly less than the
> > flushSchedulerInterval (e.g. 2500) will guarantee that the flush will
> > happen on each scheduler invocation.
> > I'm guessing that it might make sense to change the logic gating the
> > flush to something like:
> > if(timeSinceLastFlush >= 0.90 * logFlushInterval)
> > might be reasonable. Also, the scheduler probably ought to use a
> > 'fixedDelay' rather than a 'fixedRate' schedule.....
> > Jason