Good question. Some fixes are clearly critical (e.g., consumer
deadlocks) that would impact everyone and need to go into 0.8.
Unfortunately the criticality of most other fixes is subjective and
I'm not sure how feasible it is to develop a global criteria. It
probably needs to be determined through consensus whether it needs to
go into 0.8 or not. How about for now: by default we will not
incorporate fixes into 0.8 unless there is a compelling argument
(e.g., regression/clear bug with no good workaround) to do so.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What should the criteria for fixes on 0.8 be? This seems like a reasonable
> candidate but I don't think we discussed what we would be taking so I
> thought I would ask...