Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Kafka >> mail # user >> java client


Copy link to this message
-
Re: java client
We haven't really measured the scala overhead. However, my guess is that it
should be small compared to the network overhead, which one has to pay for
each request.

Thanks,

Jun

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 7:04 PM, S Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Since kafka is written in scala, when using a java client (producer or
> consumer), do you pay a slight performance hit because you guys are
> internally mapping back/forth to map a java type to a scala type?
>

 
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB