Good point about compressed message sets. I think that that works and is
simpler. We might still need the txn id to be able to do the application to
the hashmap atomically, but this depends on a number of details that aren't
really spec'd out, in particular how the replicas keep their hashmap fed
and how we fail over when mastership changes.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: