Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Kafka, mail # dev - preparing for the 0.8 final release


Copy link to this message
-
Re: preparing for the 0.8 final release
Jun Rao 2013-10-19, 06:04
Yes, 0.8 will be released from the HEAD of the 0.8 branch. Is the problem
with consuming new topics or topics whose partitions are increased? If so,
see KAFKA-1030 and KAFKA-1075.

Thanks,

Jun
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Will the 0.8 release come from the HEAD of the 0.8 branch?  I'd like to
> experiment with it, to see if it solves some of the issues I'm seeing, with
> consumers refusing to consume new messages.  We've been using the beta1
> version.
>
> I remember mention there was a Jira issues along these lines, which was
> fixed post 0.8-beta1.  Which issue was that (I'd like to see if it matches
> what I'm seeing).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I uploaded a patch against trunk which also fixes KAFKA-1036, the other
> > knows windows issue. Review appreciated. Should be an easy one.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1008
> >
> > -Jay
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > KAFKA-1008 has been checked into the 0.8 branch and needs to be
> manually
> > > double-committed to trunk. To avoid merging problems, I suggest that
> for
> > > all future changes in the 0.8 branch, we double commit them to trunk.
> Any
> > > objections?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I made another pass of the remaining jiras that we plan to fix in the
> > 0.8
> > > > final release.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-954?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)
> > > >
> > > > Do people agree with this list?
> > > >
> > > > Joe,
> > > >
> > > > I don't have good understanding of KAFKA-1018. Do you think this
> needs
> > to
> > > > be fixed in 0.8 final?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, Everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> We have been stabilizing the 0.8 branch since the beta1 release. I
> > think
> > > >> we are getting close to an 0.8 final release. I made an initial list
> > of
> > > the
> > > >> remaining jiras that should be fixed in 0.8.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Do people agree with the list?
> > > >>
> > > >> 2. If the list is good, could people help contributing/reviewing the
> > > >> remaining jiras?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Jun
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>