-Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX
Jun Rao 2013-05-09, 04:32
There is also a Ganglia reporter for metrics. Don't know how much overhead
it adds though.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Jun,
> Does that imply that what 0.8 puts in JMX is a superset of what's in JMX
> in 0.7?
> Or have names or types of beans changed?
> Also, do you recommend getting metrics via JMX or via HTTP?
> Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase / Hadoop -
> > From: Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:20 AM
> >Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX
> >0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through
> >metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring.
> >On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see
> >> http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ). We use Kafka ourselves and
> >> would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase,
> >> Solr, and other metrics we monitor.
> >> My questions:
> >> * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka?
> >> * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM?
> >> * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8? Is
> >> 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7?
> >> Thanks,
> >> Otis
> >> --
> >> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
> >> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html