Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Kafka >> mail # user >> Re: 0.8.0-beta1 is now available in public maven


+
Jason Rosenberg 2013-07-15, 19:51
Copy link to this message
-
Re: 0.8.0-beta1 is now available in public maven
Hi Jason, there are two different answers in regards to Scala version in my
opinion as there are clear distinctions between broker and
producers/consumers.

I don't know what the mix is but experience with brokers is only building
and running in production 2.8.0 and I suspect this is the same for others
out there.

It would be awesome to get more information on stats from the community and
I will have a lot more cycles starting in 2 weeks towards these type of
activities.

As far as producer/consumers go I have run 2.8.0, 2.9.0-1, 2.9.1 and 2.9.2
in production as well as python and ruby (all 0.7.X).

As I said in two weeks I have some changes occurring that will start to not
only give me more time to the community but more specific focuses.

I apologize for the delayed response.

And yeah, JIRA for the duplicate ZK it does seem odd to me too not sure off
hand why that is

Patches are always welcome from anyone :)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Any thoughts on my question, wrt scala version to prefer?  Also, what of
> the double dependency on zookeeper?  Should I file a jira for that?
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for doing this!
> >
> > I'm wondering whether there is a reason to prefer one version of scala
> > over another, if we don't have any other particular scala dependency in
> our
> > code.  Are the newer versions better/more efficient, some how?  We've
> > essentially been using 2.8.0 so far, which seems to be fine (so I'm not
> > particularly inclined to change, but I'm just curious).
> >
> > One thing I notice, in the pom file, there are 2 dependencies listed for
> > zookeeper, one of which has an exclusion clause, the other does not.   I
> > assume this is not intended:
> >
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId>
> > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId>
> > <version>3.3.4</version>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>log4j</groupId>
> > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>jline</groupId>
> > <artifactId>jline</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > and then
> >
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId>
> > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId>
> > <version>3.3.4</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> SBT uses Maven Central as a default repository (local ivy too).
> >>
> >> The artifacts are published to Maven Central so nothing you should have
> >> to-do except to specify the libraryDependencies
> >>
> >> In regards to 2.10.X support I took a really quick look at
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-717 (lots to go through in
> >> that
> >> ticket it seems) will try some of the patch applys tomorrow and see how
> >> they go.  I would be in favor of it being part of the 0.8.0 final if it
> >> all
> >> gets through and looks good and committing it to the 0.8 branch and not
> >> only trunk but lets see first what is involved building 2.10.0, 2.10.1
> and
> >> 2.10.2 and what is going to take to get it working with the patches
> >> submitted.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:44 PM, chetan conikee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Excellent
> >> >
> >> > What about the resolver ? sonatype, typeafe. maven artifactory ?
> >> > Any plans for a 2.10+ compile as well
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dima Gutzeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > What about the "newer" (not so new anymore) scala version 2.10.0 and
> >> up ?
> >> > > When will it be supported officially ?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Dima Gutzeit.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 15/7/13 9:32 AM, "Joe Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >With SBT you can use 0.8.1-beta built with any of these four Scala
> >> > > >versions
> >> > > >in libraryDependencies now
/*
Joe Stein
http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
*/

 
+
Jason Rosenberg 2013-07-17, 04:07