Question: Do we want this on 0.8 or trunk? I would feel more comfortable with it in trunk, but that means windows support in 0.8 is known to be broken (as opposed to "not known to be broken but not known to be working either" since we are not doing aggressive system testing on windows).
I would feel more comfortable doing the patch on 0.8 if there was someone who would be willing to take on real load testing and/or production operation on Windows so we could have some confidence that Kafka on Windows actually works, otherwise this could just be the tip of the iceberg.
Also it would be great to get review on that patch regardless of the destination.
So guys, do we want to do these in 0.8? The first patch was a little involved but I think it would be good to have windows support in 0.8 and it sounds like Tim is able to get things working after these changes.
-Jay On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Timothy Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Timothy Chen 2013-09-10, 05:08
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
Apache Lucene, Apache Solr and all other Apache Software Foundation projects and their respective logos are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation.
Elasticsearch, Kibana, Logstash, and Beats are trademarks of Elasticsearch BV, registered in the U.S. and in other countries. This site and Sematext Group is in no way affiliated with Elasticsearch BV.
Service operated by Sematext