Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Kafka >> mail # dev >> Patch for mmap + windows


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Patch for mmap + windows
Cool can we get a reviewer for KAFKA-1008 then? I can take on the other
issue for the checkpoint files.

-Jay
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Neha Narkhede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> +1 for windows support on 0.8
>
> Thanks,
> Neha
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So guys, do we want to do these in 0.8? The first patch was a little
> > involved but I think it would be good to have windows support in 0.8 and
> it
> > sounds like Tim is able to get things working after these changes.
> >
> > -Jay
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Timothy Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Btw, I've been running this patch in our cloud env and it's been
> working
> > > fine so far.
> > >
> > > I actually filed another bug as I saw another problem on windows
> locally
> > (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1036).
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That would be great!
> > > >
> > > > -Jay
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Timothy Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jay,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm planning to test run Kafka on Windows in our test environments
> > > > > evaluating if it's suitable for production usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can provide feedback with the patch how well it works and if we
> > > > encounter
> > > > > any functional or perf problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tim
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Elizabeth and I have a patch to support our memory mapped offset
> > > index
> > > > > > files properly on Windows:
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1008
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Question: Do we want this on 0.8 or trunk? I would feel more
> > > > comfortable
> > > > > > with it in trunk, but that means windows support in 0.8 is known
> to
> > > be
> > > > > > broken (as opposed to "not known to be broken but not known to be
> > > > working
> > > > > > either" since we are not doing aggressive system testing on
> > windows).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would feel more comfortable doing the patch on 0.8 if there was
> > > > someone
> > > > > > who would be willing to take on real load testing and/or
> production
> > > > > > operation on Windows so we could have some confidence that Kafka
> on
> > > > > Windows
> > > > > > actually works, otherwise this could just be the tip of the
> > iceberg.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also it would be great to get review on that patch regardless of
> > the
> > > > > > destination.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jay
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>