Joe Stein 2013-07-07, 13:56
Jay Kreps 2013-07-07, 21:41
I agree it is very very low touch since it is only a change when building
for publishing and does not affect the jar. I don't have objections and
unless anyone else does have objections then I will publish and see maybe
we get more errors/issues or 0.8.0-beta1 will be available from maven. I
should be able to-do this later tonight or in the morning unless someone
has an issue with proceeding.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's awesome!
> Personally I think it is okay if there is a slight cosmetic difference as
> long as we fix it before the proper 0.8 release.
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, I think we have everything now for a successful publishing to maven
> > repo for 0.8.0-betaX Kafka build on Scala 2.8.0, 2.8.2, 2.9.1, 2.9.2
> > Since I had to make a slight code change
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-963 I am not sure if it is
> > proper to officially publish the artifacts since it was not what we voted
> > upon technically speaking.
> > I don't know for sure if when I hit "close" to the staging release to
> > promote it to public release if any other errors will come up through the
> > process.
> > My thinking is that we should roll a beta2 release and give the publish
> > public release another go.
> > Thoughts?
> > /*
> > Joe Stein
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
> > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > */
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>