Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Kafka, mail # user - Re: 0.8.0-beta1 is now available in public maven


Copy link to this message
-
Re: 0.8.0-beta1 is now available in public maven
Jason Rosenberg 2013-07-17, 04:07
filed:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-978

I can try to take a look, can you point me to where/how you generate the
pom file?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Jason, there are two different answers in regards to Scala version in my
> opinion as there are clear distinctions between broker and
> producers/consumers.
>
> I don't know what the mix is but experience with brokers is only building
> and running in production 2.8.0 and I suspect this is the same for others
> out there.
>
> It would be awesome to get more information on stats from the community and
> I will have a lot more cycles starting in 2 weeks towards these type of
> activities.
>
> As far as producer/consumers go I have run 2.8.0, 2.9.0-1, 2.9.1 and 2.9.2
> in production as well as python and ruby (all 0.7.X).
>
> As I said in two weeks I have some changes occurring that will start to not
> only give me more time to the community but more specific focuses.
>
> I apologize for the delayed response.
>
> And yeah, JIRA for the duplicate ZK it does seem odd to me too not sure off
> hand why that is
>
> Patches are always welcome from anyone :)
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any thoughts on my question, wrt scala version to prefer?  Also, what of
> > the double dependency on zookeeper?  Should I file a jira for that?
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for doing this!
> > >
> > > I'm wondering whether there is a reason to prefer one version of scala
> > > over another, if we don't have any other particular scala dependency in
> > our
> > > code.  Are the newer versions better/more efficient, some how?  We've
> > > essentially been using 2.8.0 so far, which seems to be fine (so I'm not
> > > particularly inclined to change, but I'm just curious).
> > >
> > > One thing I notice, in the pom file, there are 2 dependencies listed
> for
> > > zookeeper, one of which has an exclusion clause, the other does not.
> I
> > > assume this is not intended:
> > >
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId>
> > > <version>3.3.4</version>
> > > <exclusions>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>log4j</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>jline</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>jline</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > </exclusions>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > and then
> > >
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId>
> > > <version>3.3.4</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> SBT uses Maven Central as a default repository (local ivy too).
> > >>
> > >> The artifacts are published to Maven Central so nothing you should
> have
> > >> to-do except to specify the libraryDependencies
> > >>
> > >> In regards to 2.10.X support I took a really quick look at
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-717 (lots to go through
> in
> > >> that
> > >> ticket it seems) will try some of the patch applys tomorrow and see
> how
> > >> they go.  I would be in favor of it being part of the 0.8.0 final if
> it
> > >> all
> > >> gets through and looks good and committing it to the 0.8 branch and
> not
> > >> only trunk but lets see first what is involved building 2.10.0, 2.10.1
> > and
> > >> 2.10.2 and what is going to take to get it working with the patches
> > >> submitted.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:44 PM, chetan conikee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Excellent
> > >> >
> > >> > What about the resolver ? sonatype, typeafe. maven artifactory ?
> > >> > Any plans for a 2.10+ compile as well
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dima Gutzeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>