Would you mind elaborating on what you said regarding the ordering
guaranteed; inlined below.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Felix GV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example if you partitioned using a User ID field within the messages,
> you would be
> guaranteed that all messages pertaining to a certain user would end up in
> the same partition, and that they would be correctly ordered. You should be
> aware, however, that this guarantee is only maintained as long as there are
> no consumer re-balance (which happens when adding or removing a consumer or
> a broker).
Why would consumer re-balance or broker failure alter the above partition