Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Kafka >> mail # user >> Broker List vs Zookeeper


+
Karl Kirch 2013-04-24, 18:41
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Broker List vs Zookeeper
Typically, if you use broker list, you will set up a VIP in a load balancer
in front of all brokers.

Thanks,

Jun
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Karl Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Any advice on using a static broker list vs using zookeeper? I keep having
> fits with keeping things stable with zookeeper involved (i.e. dropped
> connections).
>
> If I use a static broker list do I still get failover if a broker goes
> down? (i.e. 1 broker goes down, will my producers still try to send message
> to it?)
>
> Thanks,
> Karl

 
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB