On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Roger Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi dev list,
> As suggested on the website, this is a friendly nag. I submitted a patch
> for a config change. Can someone please take a look?
> Here's the message I posted to the users list:
> OK. I've submitted a patch along with unit tests. This change is backward
> compatible with two new optional parameters called advertise.host.name and
> advertise.port. The reason I called them that instead of zkHost.name and
> zkHost.port is that the zkHost.* names sound like they represent the host
> and port of a ZooKeeper server rather than the host and port info of the
> broker that gets published to ZK.
> # Hostname the broker will advertise to producers and consumers. If not
> set, it uses the
> # value for "host.name" if configured. Otherwise, it will use the value
> returned from
> # java.net.InetAddress.getCanonicalHostName().
> #advertise.host.name=<hostname routable by clients>
> # The port to publish to ZooKeeper for clients to use. If this is not set,
> # it will publish the same port that the broker binds to.
> #advertise.port=<port accessible by clients>
> Please take a look and let me know if anything else is needed.