Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Kafka >> mail # dev >> preparing for the 0.8 final release


+
Jun Rao 2013-09-13, 16:19
+
Haithem Jarraya 2013-09-19, 11:16
+
Neha Narkhede 2013-09-19, 16:04
+
Jun Rao 2013-10-08, 00:34
+
Joe Stein 2013-10-08, 06:49
+
Jun Rao 2013-10-09, 15:57
+
Jay Kreps 2013-10-10, 00:04
+
Jason Rosenberg 2013-10-18, 23:04
+
Jun Rao 2013-10-19, 06:04
Copy link to this message
-
Re: preparing for the 0.8 final release
The latest HEAD does seem to solve one issue, where a new topic being
created after the consumer is started, would not be consumed.

But the bigger issue is that we have a couple different consumers both
consuming the same set of topics (under different groupids), and hanging
after a while (both hanging at about the same point).  The topics in each
case are selected with a filter (actually a relatively large number of
topics, some of which are newly created over time).  I'm still not sure
whether the new version is solving this issue (since it was a rare
transient thing anyway).

Thanks,

Jason
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Yes, 0.8 will be released from the HEAD of the 0.8 branch. Is the problem
> with consuming new topics or topics whose partitions are increased? If so,
> see KAFKA-1030 and KAFKA-1075.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Will the 0.8 release come from the HEAD of the 0.8 branch?  I'd like to
> > experiment with it, to see if it solves some of the issues I'm seeing,
> with
> > consumers refusing to consume new messages.  We've been using the beta1
> > version.
> >
> > I remember mention there was a Jira issues along these lines, which was
> > fixed post 0.8-beta1.  Which issue was that (I'd like to see if it
> matches
> > what I'm seeing).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Jay Kreps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I uploaded a patch against trunk which also fixes KAFKA-1036, the other
> > > knows windows issue. Review appreciated. Should be an easy one.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1008
> > >
> > > -Jay
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > KAFKA-1008 has been checked into the 0.8 branch and needs to be
> > manually
> > > > double-committed to trunk. To avoid merging problems, I suggest that
> > for
> > > > all future changes in the 0.8 branch, we double commit them to trunk.
> > Any
> > > > objections?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > I made another pass of the remaining jiras that we plan to fix in
> the
> > > 0.8
> > > > > final release.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-954?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)
> > > > >
> > > > > Do people agree with this list?
> > > > >
> > > > > Joe,
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't have good understanding of KAFKA-1018. Do you think this
> > needs
> > > to
> > > > > be fixed in 0.8 final?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jun
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi, Everyone,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have been stabilizing the 0.8 branch since the beta1 release. I
> > > think
> > > > >> we are getting close to an 0.8 final release. I made an initial
> list
> > > of
> > > > the
> > > > >> remaining jiras that should be fixed in 0.8.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 1. Do people agree with the list?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2. If the list is good, could people help contributing/reviewing
> the
> > > > >> remaining jiras?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Jun
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

 
+
Neha Narkhede 2013-10-19, 20:05
+
Jason Rosenberg 2013-10-19, 22:25
+
Jason Rosenberg 2013-10-20, 09:49
+
Jun Rao 2013-10-20, 16:19
+
Neha Narkhede 2013-10-09, 16:20
+
Jay Kreps 2013-10-09, 18:00
+
Jun Rao 2013-10-22, 03:53
+
Jun Rao 2013-10-24, 17:13
+
Joe Stein 2013-10-24, 17:22