Fine with me.
On 10/27/2011 12:43 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> OK, how about we remove the closure client for now, since it is not a thin
> wrapper and is not being maintained. Any objections?
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Chris Burroughs
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 12:41 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
>>> We are getting close to cut a new RC for 0.7 release. Before we do that,
>>> want to ask people's opinion about those not well maintained non-java
>>> clients. Currently, at least Ruby and Closure are not well maintained
>>> (little or no activities). I am thinking about deleting those clients
>> A general point. The Clojure client doesn't seem to use the java/scala
>> api. If someone wanted to, it would probably be possible to write a
>> clojure client as a thin wrapper instead of re-implementation (and thus
>> get access to the high level consumer, etc.)
>>> our svn for now. If those clients exist in github, we can probably leave
>>> forward pointer in a README in our Apache repository (is this ok with
>> Sounds good to me.