Any comments so far?
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 14:46, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This email is essentially an attempt to work out a community consensus
> for a process around testing of Hadoop bits on real hardware.
> Here are few pre-requisites:
> - bits are produced by Jenkins builds (e.g.
> - bits are deployable (e.g. a tar ball or else comprised from all
> necessary jars, .so, driver scripts, etc.) immediately and require
> only minor configuration changes to run them on a hardware
> - set of tests (a primitive one for the beginning, more elaborate
> later on) to check if a produced build is viable and can do sensible
> things when is deployed to a cluster (sort of integration tests, if
> you will).
> At the moment there's a set of static configs (HADOOP-7278) and tiny
> deployment script which downloads, unpacks, installs, starts a cluster
> on 4 nodes. Script is driven by
> job. Successful deploys trigger a test job
> which executes some Hadoop examples at the moment.
> It is all very quickly put together to have a working validation job
> for 0.22 release and I want to limit the scope of this discussion how
> we can make a better use of this rather than finding a better solution
> for the approach. The latter can be done on JIRA, I think.
> Here's a number of questions/answers for the on-cluster testing thing:
> - who should receive notifications about failing deployment tests?
> Possible answers: specific release's maillist; an RM; a dev. list;
> - what information should be included into notification to help
> identify potential issues: a piece of commit logs; nothing at all?
> - what sets of tests to run. Answers: all hadoop examples, terasort,
> pipes, compression jobs, etc.
> - how validation failures should be treated? As a blockers (similar
> to functional test failures); "good to know but who cares" kinda
> I would like to hear your opinions on this topic.
> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.