I am not aware of the difference, can you please elaborate? That would help
other users too [+user@pig?]...
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I cannot tell you the number of scripts I have had die because of this, and
> the mass confusion it causes. Is there any reason why we can't just have
> "thing as alias:type" and "(type)thing as alias" be synonymous?