Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available for download


+
lars hofhansl 2013-06-24, 22:51
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-24, 22:53
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-25, 22:51
+
lars hofhansl 2013-06-29, 12:37
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-29, 03:06
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-03, 08:59
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-01, 11:05
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2013-07-01, 17:35
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-01, 19:02
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-02, 18:08
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2013-07-02, 18:22
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-02, 18:32
+
Elliott Clark 2013-07-02, 19:48
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-03, 16:16
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-04, 16:25
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-04, 16:57
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-06, 03:24
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 16:50
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available for download
Hi Lars,

It's rows/seconds for 1M rows (1M writes, the 1M RandomReads, only
measuring the reads).

I have the same test with 2M running for all 0.94 the releases to see
if it makes a difference.

JM

2013/7/6 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are these times or ops/sec, or something else?
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 8:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available
>  for download
>
> I have redo the tests and it's now all very consistent between all the
> recent versions
>
> Min    Max    Average    Min80%    Max80%    Variance    Precision
> hbase-0.94.5    914    1175    929    920    944    172    18.46%
> hbase-0.94.6    913    1176    927    915    954    174    18.80%
> hbase-0.94.7    913    1295    930    919    946    170    18.30%
> hbase-0.94.8    914    947    935    914    945    166    17.78%
> hbase-0.94.9    921    947    936    933    940    164    17.55%
>
> I will try to make the tests last longer to get more precise results...
>
> If we think a few nodes clusters is way beter for the performances
> tracking, then let's work that way. But if we think PE can do the job,
> it's even better ;) I just want to make sure we have accurate results
> and that we performance test the right things...
>
> I will re-run that, update the pdf and upload it again...
>
> JM
>
> 2013/7/4 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Thanks for doing all this work!
>>
>> I did find a pretty high variance between the runs, which may be at issue here.
>>
>> Maybe there are effects that only show on certain setups (disk drives, ram, jvm version, etc).
>>
>> Maybe we can compare setups offline.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 9:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available
>>  for download
>>
>> Ok. I get similar performances between 0.94.7 and 0.94.9 for the randomRead
>>
>> 0.94.7 => 1124179.9ms
>> 0.94.9 => 1110489.3ms
>>
>> I will re-run the tests one by one for all the 0.94.x versions and
>> update my charts...
>>
>> 2013/7/3 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Ok. Test pass if I run it alone:
>>>
>>> mvn clean test -P runSmallTests -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
>>> -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>  T E S T S
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook
>>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.642 sec
>>>
>>> Results :
>>>
>>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And finally passed on another one:
>>> Results :
>>>
>>> Tests run: 1359, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>>
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] Total time: 1:33:34.925s
>>> [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jul 02 16:37:59 EDT 2013
>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/594M
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> So it's all +1 for me.
>>>
>>> JM
>>>
>>> 2013/7/2 Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> untared.
>>>> Checked the sig.
>>>> Ran Ycsb.
>>>> Ran PE.
>>>> upgraded from 94.8.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> passes fine here too
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 11:22 AM
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-03, 07:55