Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available for download


+
lars hofhansl 2013-06-24, 22:51
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-24, 22:53
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-25, 22:51
+
lars hofhansl 2013-06-29, 12:37
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-06-29, 03:06
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-03, 08:59
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-01, 11:05
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2013-07-01, 17:35
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-01, 19:02
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-02, 18:08
+
Jean-Daniel Cryans 2013-07-02, 18:22
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-02, 18:32
+
Elliott Clark 2013-07-02, 19:48
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-03, 16:16
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-04, 16:25
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-04, 16:57
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-07-06, 03:24
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 16:50
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available for download
Hi Lars,

It's rows/seconds for 1M rows (1M writes, the 1M RandomReads, only
measuring the reads).

I have the same test with 2M running for all 0.94 the releases to see
if it makes a difference.

JM

2013/7/6 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are these times or ops/sec, or something else?
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 8:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available
>  for download
>
> I have redo the tests and it's now all very consistent between all the
> recent versions
>
> Min    Max    Average    Min80%    Max80%    Variance    Precision
> hbase-0.94.5    914    1175    929    920    944    172    18.46%
> hbase-0.94.6    913    1176    927    915    954    174    18.80%
> hbase-0.94.7    913    1295    930    919    946    170    18.30%
> hbase-0.94.8    914    947    935    914    945    166    17.78%
> hbase-0.94.9    921    947    936    933    940    164    17.55%
>
> I will try to make the tests last longer to get more precise results...
>
> If we think a few nodes clusters is way beter for the performances
> tracking, then let's work that way. But if we think PE can do the job,
> it's even better ;) I just want to make sure we have accurate results
> and that we performance test the right things...
>
> I will re-run that, update the pdf and upload it again...
>
> JM
>
> 2013/7/4 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Thanks for doing all this work!
>>
>> I did find a pretty high variance between the runs, which may be at issue here.
>>
>> Maybe there are effects that only show on certain setups (disk drives, ram, jvm version, etc).
>>
>> Maybe we can compare setups offline.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 9:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available
>>  for download
>>
>> Ok. I get similar performances between 0.94.7 and 0.94.9 for the randomRead
>>
>> 0.94.7 => 1124179.9ms
>> 0.94.9 => 1110489.3ms
>>
>> I will re-run the tests one by one for all the 0.94.x versions and
>> update my charts...
>>
>> 2013/7/3 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Ok. Test pass if I run it alone:
>>>
>>> mvn clean test -P runSmallTests -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
>>> -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>  T E S T S
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook
>>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.642 sec
>>>
>>> Results :
>>>
>>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And finally passed on another one:
>>> Results :
>>>
>>> Tests run: 1359, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>>
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] Total time: 1:33:34.925s
>>> [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jul 02 16:37:59 EDT 2013
>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/594M
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> So it's all +1 for me.
>>>
>>> JM
>>>
>>> 2013/7/2 Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> untared.
>>>> Checked the sig.
>>>> Ran Ycsb.
>>>> Ran PE.
>>>> upgraded from 94.8.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> passes fine here too
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 11:22 AM
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-03, 07:55
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB