Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> on HBase 1.0


+
Andrew Purtell 2011-11-16, 23:50
+
Stack 2011-11-16, 23:52
+
Ted Yu 2011-11-16, 23:54
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-11-16, 23:57
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-11-17, 00:01
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-11-17, 00:05
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-11-17, 00:10
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-11-17, 00:00
+
Ted Yu 2011-11-17, 00:03
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-11-16, 23:57
My 2 cents - whatever branch we decide to put out as 1.0, I think we
should have a stability/testing phase without adding too many features, so
that it is pretty stable to end users.
- Karthik
On 11/16/11 3:57 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: on HBase 1.0
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>  It's possible a release of 0.20.20X (X=5 I think) as Hadoop 1.0 is
>> imminent.
>>>
>>>  The Hadoop 1.0 release is an acknowledgement of reality -- 0.20
>>>branch is
>> in production at many places.
>>>
>>>  I know we agreed to separate HBase versioning from Hadoop versioning,
>> but if we continue to number HBase as 0.X after there is a Hadoop 1.0,
>>there is
>> an implicit marketing message that we feel HBase is not as ready as
>>Hadoop.
>>>
>>>
>>>  I propose that we consider, if and when Hadoop 1.0 is released, that
>>>we
>> release HBase 1.0 off of the 0.92 branch. A subsequent release off of
>>trunk
>> could be 1.1 or 2.0 at the discretion of the RM and community consensus.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed.  Was thinking 0.94 could e be 1.0.0 since its getting a load
>> of 0.89-fb branch forward-ports.   Would have to come out right after
>> 0.92 though.
>
>
>Releasing 0.94 as 1.0 like that, for that reason, sounds good to me, but
>I think that would imply 0.92 is merely a stepping stone to 1.0 aka 0.94.
>Perhaps that is accurate.
>
>    - Andy
>
+
lars hofhansl 2011-11-17, 01:07
+
Stack 2011-11-17, 03:53
+
lars hofhansl 2011-11-17, 04:07
+
Nicolas Spiegelberg 2011-11-21, 16:31
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB