Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> 'Redundant' mutations

Copy link to this message
Re: 'Redundant' mutations
You get "a"

By default tables are configured with a "versioning iterator" that filters out all but the latest "version" of a key, meaning the key with the latest timestamp, which provides the cleaning out of redundant keys that differ only in timestamp behavior you describe.
On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:

> At time 0, I make a Mutation with put("a", "b", "c");
> At time 1, I do it again.
> Do I get:
> a) two copies of the same data with different timestamps?
> b) an error?
> c) something else?
> If the idea I'm looking for is to end up with one item without doing a
> scan each time to see if it's out there, is there a 'garbage
> collection' cliche for cleaning out redundant items that differ only
> in timestamp?