On 23 April 2013 17:25, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha is released I'd like
> to open up a discussion on what practical steps
> would it take for us as a community to get
> Hadoop 2.X from alpha to beta?
> There's quite a few preconditions to be met for a piece of
> software to reach beta status. Quite a few of them are now
> being discussed in a neighboring thread 'Compatibility in
> Apache Hadoop' ( http://s.apache.org/VE1 ) but I'd like to
> kick off a broader discussion: what do you think a *complete*
> list should look like, before we can honestly signal this
> change to the rest of the world.
> It would be very nice if the things that are offered as part
> of the criteria are easily quantifiable, but lets brainstorm
> first anyway. We can always stack-rank and quantify later.
> I need to get YARN-117 in before the service lifecycle is frozen forever