Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Chukwa >> mail # dev >> [DISCUSS] Applying commit-then-review


Copy link to this message
-
[DISCUSS] Applying commit-then-review
Hi,

If I understand correctly, Chukwa is following the review-then-commit
(RTC) pattern: Before every commit, a patch gets posted to a JIRA and
only on positive feedback it is committed.
As far as I can see, this is inherited from Hadoop's policies.
However, most projects at the ASF apply commit-then-review (CTR). CTR
has the advantage of being more agile, requiring less work (creating
issue, patch file, attaching it, waiting for feedback etc.) while
providing full oversight:
Every commit is reviewed by other committers after it happened, can be
discussed, reverted, improved etc. as a 'work in progress'.
It is best practice in CTR-mode to selectively use RTC, e.g. for big
patches or for potentially delicate commits.

I think Chukwa would profit from changing to CTR, so I'd like to know
what you think about it.

Thanks,

   Bernd
+
Ariel Rabkin 2010-09-13, 20:14
+
Eric Yang 2010-09-13, 20:49
+
Bill Graham 2010-09-13, 20:50
+
Bernd Fondermann 2010-09-14, 10:17
+
Bill Graham 2010-09-14, 21:22
+
Jerome Boulon 2010-09-21, 05:00
+
Jiaqi Tan 2010-09-21, 05:12
+
William A. Rowe Jr. 2010-09-21, 05:55
+
Ariel Rabkin 2010-09-21, 20:50
+
William A. Rowe Jr. 2010-09-21, 21:38
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB