Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-12-02, 22:10
Nicolas Liochon 2012-12-02, 23:33
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-12-03, 02:53
Nicolas Liochon 2012-12-03, 09:43
ramkrishna vasudevan 2012-12-03, 03:45
Michel Segel 2012-12-03, 10:23
A move is logical in terms of a region and region servers (i.e. only
an ID and a command is passed around), but yes the location of blocks
could impact its performance a bit (until a further compaction), but
would not prevent availability.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Michel Segel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He could have meant that the region was unavailable for a longer duration.
> My take is that you could have limited bandwidth, and a very large region on the move.
> While I don't imagine that it could take that long to move a region, you never know how things are tuned and you could in theory hit a timeout.
> I also have to wonder if HBase relies on the underlying HDFS to handle the move.
> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos...
> Mike Segel
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 3:45 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Jean
>> Incase of Puts and Scans if the split is in progress it will retry.
>> Suppose before the client gets to know about the split, still if the put
>> is directed with the parent region row key, internally HBase directs it to
>> the correct daughter region.
>> But i am not clear in what you mean by Region server down for 3 mins? You
>> mean during split your RS went down?
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Ok. so if on the client side I'm "simply" using Puts, scans and gets
>>> fron the HTableInterface, I don't have to worry about that since it
>>> will retry.
>>> But I still should consider catching exceptions when regions are not
>>> available because the region server is down for less than 3 minutes,
>>> 2012/12/2, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> It's not accessible, but it's more or less transparent (latency impact
>>>> aside) for the end user: the hbase client will retry the operation.
>>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-12-03, 17:30