Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94.


+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-01, 16:31
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-01, 19:00
+
Elliott Clark 2013-03-01, 22:43
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-03-01, 23:12
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-02, 00:55
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-01, 23:11
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 02:10
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-02, 02:17
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-03-02, 02:25
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-02, 02:24
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-03, 13:50
+
Ted 2013-03-03, 14:12
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94.
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-03, 14:38
I'm not sure that is necessary. I think we can establish consensus without
doing so, but if you like, call a vote.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Ted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Do we need to start another thread voting for options 1 and 2 ?
>
> We should make a decision soon so that the next 0.94 release can be made.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mar 3, 2013, at 5:50 AM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Concur. +1 on option #1 and #2, with #1 preferred, -1 on #3.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:10 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So it seems that until we have a stable 0.96 (maybe 0.96.1 or 0.96.2) we
> >> have three options:
> >> 1. Backport new features to 0.94 as we see fit as long as we do not
> >> destabilize 0.94.
> >> 2. Declare a certain point release (0.94.6 looks like a good candidate)
> as
> >> a "long term", create an 0.94.6 branch (in addition to the usual 0.94.6
> >> tag) and than create 0.94.6.x fix only releases. I would volunteer to
> >> maintain a 0.94.6 branch in addition to the 0.94 branch.
> >> 3. Categorically do not backport new features into 0.94 and defer to
> 0.95.
> >>
> >> I'd be +1 on option #1 and #2, and -1 on option #3.
> >>
> >> -- Lars
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >   - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>

--
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-03-04, 13:41
+
Stack 2013-03-04, 21:27
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-04, 22:29
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-05, 01:57
+
Dave Wang 2013-03-01, 16:38
+
Lars Hofhansl 2013-03-02, 02:46
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-03-02, 02:54
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-03-02, 03:12
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 03:24
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-02, 03:30
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 03:44
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-03-02, 11:43
+
Ted 2013-03-02, 11:57
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-02, 15:36
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 16:47
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-02, 16:14
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-02, 16:26
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 20:46
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-03-02, 21:49
+
Stack 2013-03-02, 23:24
+
lars hofhansl 2013-03-02, 03:23
+
Lars Hofhansl 2013-03-02, 02:45