-Re: git vs. svn
Jesse Yates 2011-09-17, 01:51
With a nod to git-svn for coolness.
- Jesse Yates
Sent from my iPhone.
On Sep 16, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Adam Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With a little more research, it looks like the git mirror gives us the best
> of both worlds anyway. Therefore, I declare this question moot.
> On Sep 16, 2011 8:49 PM, "Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The project must use Apache svn as the definitive repository if you
>> want to be at Apache. You get a git mirror, and some day there's a
>> plot to allow full git, but some day is not today.
>> Github as a primary reference is right out.
>> Many of us make good use of git-svn at this point, infrastructure
>> provides git repos to clone that are already tuned for that.
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jesse Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Personally, I like to use git for my development.
>>> I know that other projects in apache commit to a main svn, but have a
>>> git that people can pull from. See
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToContribute where they mention
>>> they have an apache git that mirrors the svn.
>>> -Jesse Yates
>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Adam Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> I've heard a lot of people express a preference for git over svn. What
>>>> people think about the prospect of using git (presumably on github)
>>>> than Apache's svn servers for Accumulo? Would this be compatible with
>>>> other Apache infrastructure we would like to use (jira, confluence,
>>>> Has any other Apache project gone this route?