Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # user >> Lucene instead of HFiles?

Otis Gospodnetic 2012-10-05, 03:34
Adrien Mogenet 2012-10-05, 06:36
Renaud Delbru 2012-10-05, 08:48
Otis Gospodnetic 2012-10-06, 02:31
Otis Gospodnetic 2012-10-06, 02:21
Fuad Efendi 2012-10-06, 02:35
Copy link to this message
RE: Lucene instead of HFiles?
If you don't like HFiles, and prefer Solr instead, consider Map. It is very
: -  )

What about EhCache? Still synchronized?......... use LinkedHashMap......

You just need "inverted table" for a search by secondary index, and you are
comparing Lucene with HTable... wow... everything depends on use case... I
prefer auxiliary tables in HBase with extra fastest FIFO in-memory caches,
and if I don't need transactions - I don't use them...

-----Original Message-----
From: Fuad Efendi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October-05-12 10:35 PM
Subject: RE: Lucene instead of HFiles?

Lucene sucks with traditional "secondary indices" for traditional tables...
engineering overhead, too much... and you indeed already have kind of
"secondary indices" with HFile and Bloom Filter structure... just design
"secondary" Bloom filters etc.......

Yes, Lucene/Solr already implement this functionality. But we can improve it
for "non-tokenized" secondary indices.
Lars George 2012-10-05, 09:11
Michael Segel 2012-10-05, 11:14
Otis Gospodnetic 2012-10-06, 02:38
Jacques 2012-10-05, 13:43