On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> Now that MR2 is in trunk and 0.23, but we're still maintaining it in
>> 0.20.20x, what's the correct protocol for fixes when the component no
>> longer is used in trunk? Must we contribute patches for trunk as well
>> as 20x, if we plan to commit to 20x, so that people might backport to
>> 22 or 21? Or can we assume that providing a patch for 0.20.20x is
>> enough, and if anyone wants to put it in 21 or 22, they will
> +1, I thought we agreed that there is no point committing to trunk when we aren't going to maintain it.
+1. That's my understanding as well. Which reminds me, I'll get
another patch up for MAPREDUCE-2736 today.
>> Of course library or client fixes should go in trunk - I'm just
>> talking about changes to JT or one of the schedulers.
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera