Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 0 is available for download


Copy link to this message
-
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
Elliott Clark 2013-06-11, 22:51
+1
* the sigs match.
* The change log is good.
* hbase starts up
* it tests can pass with some retries
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Have anyone tested the secure HBase?  I have some problem to get it work.
> For me, the region server could not connect to the master due to
>
> 2013-06-11 15:19:52,101 DEBUG [IPC Reader 6 on port 36000] ipc.RpcServer:
> Connection authorization failed: Protocol interface
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.RegionServerStatusProtos$RegionServerStatusService$BlockingInterface
> is not known.
>
> Is this some configuration issue, or an issue introduced by HBASE-8214?  I
> don't see this interface in class HBasePolicyProvider.
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't
> > tested hadoop1.
> > I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to
> > you.
> >
> > My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more
> > stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this.
> >
> > In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it
> has
> > to be a file copy, well, let's do that.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon.   Sounds like our mvn publishing needs
> a
> > > bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?).  You +1 on this as
> dev
> > > release?
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
> > > >
> > > > If I build hbase locally, with
> > > >  mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> > > > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> > > > => Compilation & execution works.
> > > >
> > > > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> > > > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
> > > >
> > > > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> > > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> > > >         at
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
> > > >
> > > > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only,
> > as
> > > > expected.
> > > >
> > > > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from
> > which
> > > > repo?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have
> > anything
> > > on
> > > > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security
> reasons
> > > (if
> > > > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate.  Should we put this
> out
> > as
> > > > > 0.95.1?
> > > > >
> > > > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets
> keep
> > > the
> > > > > vote period short.  Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> > > > >
> > > > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > > > >
> > > > >   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> > > > >
> > > > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> > > > >
> > > > > All feedback is welcome.  We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI,
> and
> > > of
> > > > > course,
> > > > > any bugs found.  I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would