Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> 0.95 branch done (WAS -> Re: Heads-up! Branching 0.96 (actually 0.95) this weekend)


Copy link to this message
-
0.95 branch done (WAS -> Re: Heads-up! Branching 0.96 (actually 0.95) this weekend)
I just branched 0.95 from trunk.

The intent is that we will now let trunk go and drive to make a 0.95.0
release for folks to bang on so they get to try all the goodness that has
been baking in trunk.  After 0.95.0 goes out, dependent on feedback, we
might do a 0.95.1, etc., but all strictly experimental odd-number releases
that are not for production and we reserve the right to break compatibility
across 0.95 releases (if we've messed something up).

Once we have confidence that 0.95.0 basically works, and once we have
figured the migration from 0.94, we'll branch 0.96 from off the 0.95 branch
and will then stabilize a 0.96.0 release.  All 0.96.x releases will be
taken from this branch off a branch.

The 0.95 branch is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/branches/0.95

I set up 0.95 builds for hadoop1 and hadoop2.  They run on same triggers as
TRUNK builds.

In JIRA, I moved all issues with fix against 0.96.0 to instead be against
0.95.0 (Issues marked fix for 0.94 and 0.96 will now just be for 0.95.0 --
JIRA wouldn't let me do any different; sorry about that).  This means
0.96.0 now has no issues against it.

Let me know if I messed anything up.

Thanks,
St.Ack

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All the big code moves are done.  Let me branch now.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You the man Elliott.  This is a big code move  so would be good to have
>> this side of the branch.  If you can't do it on the w/e, we can do it
>> post-branch too.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll try and get that to you tonight or at least this weekend so you can
>>> branch on schedule.
>>> On Feb 22, 2013 4:30 PM, "Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > When we think APIs and wire-format sufficiently stabilized, we'll
>>> then
>>> > > cut
>>> > > > a 0.96 from the 0.95 branch and release 0.96.0, etc., from here on
>>> out.
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > We need to do the client move before the branch.  Other than that
>>> sounds
>>> > > good.
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > You waiting on me (rpc) Elliott?  If so, don't I'd say.  I can rebase
>>> no
>>> > problem and I don't see the last part of the rpc going in until it has
>>> had
>>> > a good bit more review and a bit of profiling done.
>>> >
>>> > Agree would be nice getting client refactor in before branch.  Its a
>>> big
>>> > code move.
>>> >
>>> > St.Ack
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>