-Re: After compile, the lib directory has commons-io-1.4 but instamo needs 2.4?
Sounds reasonable to me.
On 02/12/2013 09:59 PM, David Medinets wrote:
> Because Instamo is included in v1.5 and it wants commons io v2.4, I'd
> vote for it to happen sooner than v1.6 so that users don't have the
> change to be confused. Or Instamo can be changed to remove the
> dependency. Since this issue is now validated, I'll create a jira
> ticket for discussion.
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Josh Elser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would be good to cross-reference
>> http://commons.apache.org/io/upgradeto2_4.html and
>> Looks like the usage of commons-io classes is rather minimal: `
>> fgrep -R "org.apache.commons.io" accumulo-trunk/`. Personally, unless there
>> are known issues, I'm apt to say fix in 1.6. That's just a gut feeling
>> though; I can't say I'm really adamant one way or the other.
>> On 02/12/2013 07:33 PM, David Medinets wrote:
>>> I don't know what would need adjusted to get the newer jar file in the
>>> lib directory; or if 2.4 might cause a conflict? Can someone weigh in
>>> with an opinion?